The figure for internal bit depth shows what the internal headroom of each plug-in will be like, where that information is available: some manufacturers have not published information on this. I was able to achieve figures in excess of 100 percent because my system is based on a dual 1.42GHz G4 mirror door Mac, making my ceiling 200 percent.

In the end I had the Mac OS Activity Monitor window open and noted the increase in percentage processor use when I added 32 instances of a particular plug-in, the idea being to simulate a situation where one channel strip plug-in was used on every track of a 32-track session. However, measuring the processor use of the RTAS versions was a little trickier. With the System Usage window open and on Gas Gauge, I just added instances of a particular plug-in until they filled a chip. The test for how many would fit on an HD DSP chip was reasonably easy. We have 11 channel strip plug-ins under test here, and the table above (click to enlarge) lists the details of exactly what each plug-in includes, along with my comments on each one and measurements of the system resources they require. What Is A Channel Strip?ĭifferent manufacturers incorporate different features into their channel strip plug-ins, but for the purposes of this article, a plug-in must have at least an EQ and a dynamics section to be considered a channel strip. A channel strip plug-in that combined at least some of these functions would free up some insert points.Īnother potential advantage is that having one plug-in window covering all the channel strip functions would help to simplify and streamline our workflow, compared with having five plug-in windows open simultaneously to manage and make adjustments on all these separate plug-ins. If you then wanted to add, say, a treble enhancer or an ADT effect, you'd find all your plug-in slots already used up. For example, on a vocal track you might have an EQ followed by a pitch-correction plug-in, compressor, de-esser and reverb or delay. There is a brick-wall limit of five insert points on each track in Pro Tools, and you can quite quickly fill them up with routine plug-ins. The most obvious reason for using channel strip plug-ins is to free up insert points. Do they offer anything you couldn't get by using separate EQ and compressor plug-ins, or are they just a clever marketing trick to get us to buy more plug-ins? And which ones shine from the bunch? There has been a mild explosion of channel strip plug-ins in the Pro Tools universe recently, so I thought it would be good to take a look at what makes them tick. It saves on insert slots, but do channel strips offer any other benefits, and which ones stand out from the crowd? The trend among plug-in designers is to integrate commonly used processes such as EQ and compression into a single plug-in.

Waves ssl e channel vs uad